 |
| TO VIEW SITE SECTION, CLICK ON DESIRED SECTION LINK
BELOW |
|
|
|
 |
other
calculators: body mass
index .. road
course .. track
|
AGE GRADING CALCULATOR - 1994 VERSION (OBSOLETE) |
NOTE: To use the calculator, a red "Java Enabled" must
appear at right -->
. If the phrase does not appear, change your browser
settings to enable Java (or JavaScript). |
This page
calculates the age-graded percentage and age-adjusted time for all
WAVA supported ages (8-100) and walking distances (1500m, mile, 3K,
5K, 8K, 10K, 15K, 20K, 25K, 30K, 40K, and 50K) PLUS some
popular running distances (mile, 5K, 10K, and 20K).
This calculator uses the 1994 version of the WAVA age-graded tables and is presented solely for use in comparing current performances with those calculated using the older tables. Unless you are making such a comparison, please use the current calculator
The calculator allows you to age-grade up to five
performances at the same or different distances and, based on
estimates of equivalent effort, to compare walking and running
performances at four popular distances to estimate your finish times
for other distances (walking or running) to estimate your age-adjusted
finish times for other distances (walking or running)
to estimate your
finish times as if you were any age from 8 to
100 Use the calculator to answer the following types
of questions: Based on my recent 5K or 10K
times, what is a reasonable goal for me in the 20K?
At age 54, do my slower
times really indicate poorer performances? Given my recent best times,
which distance offers me the best opportunity for
improvement? How do my current walking
times stack up against my running times in high school?
Did that runner
who passed me in the race this weekend REALLY beat me?
Who was the
age-graded winner of our 5K / 10K / 20K extravaganza last
Saturday? Age grading is a subjective process based on
careful analysis of "world best" times at each age for both males
and females. It is NOT an exact science. At the same time, it
provides one of the best-available tools for evaluating,
forecasting, and comparing walking and/or running performances. Note
also that all of the distance comparisons are based on your being
physically able to do the various distances, and to have trained at
least as well for those distances as you trained for the distance
entered. Being able to perform at the 75% level for 5K in no way
infers that you can simply go out and perform at the same level in a
50K. With these caveats in mind, we invite you to explore the world
of age grading as you have never been able to do so
before. The performance percentage values shown
below estimate how your race times compare to a "world best" time
for the same age-gender-distance combination. For example, an 80%
estimates the race pace to be 80% of a "world best" pace. The
adjusted finish times shown below estimate what your finish
time would be if you were in your prime years of 20-29. If you are
now in those prime years, the adjusted finish times are the same as
the actual finish time entered. For a detailed explanation of these
values, please see the Calculation
Notes page. ERROR NOTE: Times generating
percentages less than 10% or more than 105% are assumed to be
data-entry errors and are not accepted. Both conditions would be
highly unlikely. For example, to go under 10%, you would have to
take more than 60 minutes to walk a mile. To go over 105%, you would
have to race 5% faster than the current world record for your
age-gender category. And now, on to the
calculator. |
 |
|
|
NOTES
1. The age grading information upon which this calculator is based was compiled by the World Association of Veteran Athletes (WAVA), and published by National Masters News. This page uses the 1994 version of the tables. A printed copy of the tables for all track and field, racewalking, and long-distance running can be obtained from National Masters News using instructions printed at the bottom of Page One of our Age Grading section.
2. The "world best" times that serve as the basis for the age grading tables reflect a mathematical smoothing to compensate for distance-age-gender records that are spectacularly high, pitfully low, or have too few examples to provide a reasonable value (e.g., fastest 50K by a 99-year old racewalker). Because of the smoothing process, actual world "records" may generate a performance percentage above or below 100%.
|
|